Quantum computing stock market

Quantum computing stock market

Posted: RUSty Date of post: 29.05.2017

Don't hesitate to tell us about a ticker we should know about! Context and insight must be provided; empty posts or empty posts with links will be automatically removed. Posts regarding this topic will be automatically removed. Discussion Quantum computing - D-Wave self. Hello, I am new investor and need some help. I believe that D-Wave systems might be a big deal in the future and found that it is finally planning IPO.

Chief Financial Officer -Develop and execute strategic financing plan for D-Wave, this will likely include an IPO and potentially include additional venture and strategic financing.

V hold D-Wave shares. Google also said that D-Wave computer really works: D-Wave is selling a "quantum" computer that can only solve 2 problems: It cannot solve the actual problems that make quantum computing so useful and so hyped.

D-Wave is marketing a misleading narrative which the tech media is eating up. Here is an actual summary of what the device can do, and why it's not especially useful. However, when they show they can solve 3-SAT or Integer Factorization I will invest immediatelybecause a device that could quickly solve those problems is worth billions.

Until then I am holding out.

quantum computing stock market

It all depends on how much if a risk you're willing to take and how much you believe in this company being the first or best in the industry. If you believe that they will be able to solve those problems, you'd probably make more money investing before they release information of them solving harder problems.

This is a ton of risk, however, and you can also lose big time. My smartphone can solve 3-sat. It can't do it quickly, but I doubt any computer will ever be able to do that.

My smartphone can also do SA and QMC because they are both classical algorthims.

Quantum finance - Wikipedia

In other words, unless OP thinks my smartphone is worth 10 million dollars, I'd also invest my money elsewhere. A quantum computer can solve 3-SAT and IFP exponentially faster than a classical one. That's why quantum computers are so exciting. Quantum computers already work, we can factor 4-bit numbers with them. With a half a century optimizing, classical computers can factor bit numbers. Quantum computers work and will be regularly used for certain tasks within a decade.

You either know what that means for your claim or I need to teach you basic complexity theory, which I'm a little too tired for. Google 3-sat, np-complete, NP and BQP. I study this shit in grad school. You obviously have no clue what a quantum computer can do or why it is useful.

To spell it out to you: A quantum computer can probabilistically solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time. The best classical algorithms solve in exponential time. You obviously do not understand this. Oh, wow, grad school?

Maybe intimidation works elsewhere for you in your life, but I'm frankly just smiling while picturing the little self important student you are. I'm so used to your type. Saying a quantum computer can solve a NP complete problem efficiently would imply that NP is included in BQP. This is nogle known,nor is it commonly thought to be the case. Anyway, that's the gist.

I've given you enough links so you can learn if you so choose. If all you have are more nasty and immature rants please keep them to yourself. If a student isn't willing to learn, I don't bother teaching. It's a two way street.

Seriously just read the first page of BQP on wikipedia. Someone in grad school should at least be able to do that. FYI, my point is not about complexity theory.

Faster as in wall time. That is why they are valuable. Please explain how your smartphone will solve these problems in less time than a quantum computer. Until then, what you say is still wrong. Just give up it's pathetic. Saying a quantum computer can solve something exponentially faster than a classical computer IS about complexity theory. The word "exponentially" makes that clear.

quantum computing stock market

A linear time quantum algorithm for 3SAT. Wall time and complexity time are absolutely not the same thing.

quantum computing stock market

It takes "exponential" time to brute force an AES key i. O 2 nn is the number of bits. But every AES key in existence today can be trivially brute forced in O 1 time. The minor issue is the constant factor that's greater than the number of particles in the universe. Just because two problems are both in O 1 does not mean they are equally difficult to solve. This is basic complexity theory, How do you not know this.

A sizable quantum computer will be able to decrypt a bit AES key in less wall time than any classical computer today. One of the many differences between having an actual understanding of a topic and trying to google your way to an understanding is the ability to know when something is a credible source. You found a random unpublished paper on arxiv. You know whats impressive? Getting something rejected from arxiv. I remember that paper and it didn't even make a blib on the radar.

You can read more details here. I enjoy looking through papers like this one, because they're an excellent source of subtle misconceptions worth explaining. In the last paper I covered, the problem was that all the optimization came from post-selection. This paper has a different mistake: You obviously enjoy moving around goalposts.

I'm not disagreeing that quantum computers most probably are better at certain tasks. However, you made a number of claims beyond that. Its those claims I take issue with. I'm well aware of shor's algorithms.

Your problem is that the fastest known classical algorthim for integer factorization is sub-exponential but super polynomial and hence not thought to be in P. So unless you have a quantum algorithm where time moves backwards as you do integer factorization you're wrong about that.

But it's a common misconception to think pound euro tourist rates post office an exponential speed up so I had decided to let it go.

But since you're so arrogant you need to be taught a lesson. Well, more than one. Since youre too lazy to read the wiki for BQP, maybe you can take the time to look at an image.

Notice the number of NP complete problems included in BQP. On a slight tangent Would they see a big bump when the IPO happens or is there some other strategic point I should be waiting for? I think your best time to sell will probably be shortly after the time when D-Wave announces that they have in fact filed for an IPO. Here's what's behind my opinion:. As you quantum computing stock market know, TINY currently is trading at a discount to NAV, and is pretty low volume.

This is the time when there will be maximum uncertainty and the least concern about just how much of D-WAVE does TINY own, and uncertainty of how much D-WAVE will be worth. Some will speculate that it will be worth billions right out of the gate. Therefore, this initial period will be the time when it is most likely that there will be some froth in TINY's stock price.

As the IPO approaches, it is likely that wilder speculation on the valuation will calm down, and the value of TINY's D-Wave stake will become more apparent, and it won't be as big as some were expecting. Froth in TINY's stock price will start to come out. Furthermore, as the IPO draws near, people who bought TINY for exposure to DWAVE will start to come out of TINY because they will be able to buy DWAVE directly.

Once the IPO happens, TINY's valuation of its stake in DWAVE will actually reflect a discount compared to the market price of the shares because TINY will be subject to a six month lockup on selling its shares, so the impact on TINY's NAV will be even a further bit less than some people were expecting. Basically, once D-Wave or any portfolio company goes public, there will be no reason to "overpay" to buy TINY based on its holdings in that company, and in fact good reasons to expect a discount.

The scenario I just outlined is pretty much what happened when a TINY holding called Solazyme IPOed in That IPO was much anticipated, compared to TINY's other holdings. If you look at TINY's chart, there lowest deposit online stock trading a one day spike above 6 in February, I'm pretty sure that was the day when the news that Solazyme was IPOing became public. Solazyme finally IPO'ed in May, and you can see how TINY's stock price behaved after that initial spike when roboforex contest rating bought TINY first and asked questions later.

How long a period do you think the spike will be for TINY once Dwave IPO is announced? Will I need to be constantly money maker dj sava feat andreea mp3 or will I have a few days to notice the news?

Sadly I also invested in Solazyme and it has fucked me pretty hard. Any thoughts on if that one will ever rebound? It probably would only last a few days tops, unless there is a lot more sizzle in the media about D-wave and "revolutionary quantum computing that is million times faster" and Google's interest, etc. I haven't verified this right now, I am just going off of memory, so take all of this with a grain of salt.

Off the top of my head in very round numbers, I think that for every billion of value in D-Wave as the ownership is currently structured i. D-Wave's largest owner is Goldman Sachs, I believe, so if they are able to work their magic and get an IPO valuation in the multiple billions, then TINY would be off to the races. But let's say DWave announced an IPO today with a value in the high hundreds of millions. If you got a spike in TINY to the high 3's or even 4 you would be doing very well, and waiting for anything above that would be hoping for a lot of irrational money to come flooding in.

Which I guess could happen, but Solazyme's value really isn't dependent on the price of oil anymore, as they are emphasizing higher margin cosmetics, food ingredients and speciality chemicals now. There is a reddit "Solazyme" run by investors for investors. I remain invested, so I feel your pain. I'll try to keep you in mind and we can touch base again when TINY or SZYM start making some gains.

Hey, I don't know if you still are interested in TINY or D-Wave, but I thought you might find this of interest. It's a press release about a virtual roadshow for D-Wave's Series J offering coming up. I don't know if the virtual roadshow will be open to anyone who wants to see it, or only to accredited investors, but it might be worth a looksee. I'm really new to this, so this might be a really dumb question, but you can't buy stocks from a private company, can you?

Don't you have to wait for the initial public offering before you can buy stocks from D-Wave? Literally right there in the second sentence and mentioned three more times in the rest of the post. Ok yeah it was a dumb question. V and sell them when D-Wave does their IPO.

Those angel investors are actually taking all the profits of what used to be hyped up as IPOs back in the dotcom days. So overall, the normal players like us don't get that huge opportunity any more, and it shows in the market as most bigtime IPOs lose money mid to longer term. I just read the links,and "this will likely include an IPO and potentially include additional venture and strategic financing. Thank you all for answers. I have decided to buy shares both of the companies that holds D-Wave shares and buy directly on the IPO when it comes.

I would walk into any random university in the world doing quantum computing and ask them what they think of d wave. Then I'd reconsider my options and waste my money on something more reasonable such as coke and prostitutes.

Quantum mechanics and entanglement still have not even been "proven" other than the Double-slit experiment which does not definitively prove that quantum mechanics is real.

Such a stupid comment. Flash memory relies on the quantum tunneling effect to trap electrons in the middle of dielectric, which are used to retain data for years. All integrated circuits i. While the D-Wave may not be a true "quantum" computer, it does rely on quantum effects along with every cellphone and laptop you use today. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms and that you have read our Privacy Policy and Content Policy. Log in or sign up in seconds.

Submit a new text post. Resources Wiki for new investors Join our live chat! Pattern day trading Rules Disclose any open positions when discussing a particular stock or financial instrument. Spam, ads, business solicitation, and self-promotion posts or comments will be removed. Trolling, insults, or harassment, especially in posts requesting advice, will be removed.

This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment. Frankly on either claim, but the 3-SAT one is more outrageous.

Quantum Computing Market Forecast | Market Research Media

Although the Quantum fourier transform is more versatile. Here's what's behind my opinion: Any suggestions as to what you think a good target price would be? There was an article about this somewhere recently. Take ownership of what you write online pussy. Posts are automatically archived after 6 months.

Rating 4,2 stars - 873 reviews
inserted by FC2 system