Insider trading is the trading of a public company 's stock or other securities such as bonds or stock options by individuals with access to nonpublic information about the company. In various countries, some kinds of trading based on insider information is illegal. This is because it is seen as unfair to other investors who do not have access to the information, as the investor with insider information could potentially make far larger profits that a typical investor could not make.

The authors of one study claim that illegal insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers, thus decreasing overall economic growth. Trading by specific insiders, such as employees, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on material information not in the public domain. Many jurisdictions require that such trading be reported so that the transactions can be monitored. In the United States and several other jurisdictions, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade.

In these cases, insiders in the United States are required to file a Form 4 with the U. Securities and Exchange Commission SEC when buying or selling shares of their own companies. The rules governing insider trading are complex and vary significantly from country to country. The extent of enforcement also varies from one country to another.

The definition of insider in one jurisdiction can be broad, and may cover not only insiders themselves but also any persons related to them, such as brokers, associates and even family members. A person who becomes aware of non-public information and trades on that basis may be guilty. Rules prohibiting or criminalizing insider trading on material non-public information exist in most jurisdictions around the world Bhattacharya and Daouk,but the details and the efforts to enforce them vary considerably.

In the United States, Sections 16 b and 10 b of the Securities Exchange Act of directly and indirectly address insider trading. Congress enacted this law after the stock market crash of Trades made by these types of insiders in the company's own stock, based on material non-public information, are considered fraudulent since the insiders are violating the fiduciary duty that they owe to the shareholders.

The corporate insider, simply by accepting employment, has undertaken a legal obligation to the shareholders to put the shareholders' interests before their own, in matters related to the corporation. When insiders buy or sell based upon company-owned information, they are violating their obligation to the shareholders. For example, illegal insider trading would occur if the chief executive officer of Company A learned prior to a public announcement that Company A will be taken over and then bought shares in Company A while knowing that the share price would likely rise.

In the United States and many other jurisdictions, however, "insiders" are not just limited to corporate officials and major shareholders where illegal insider trading is concerned but can include any individual who trades shares based on material non-public information in violation of some duty of trust. This duty may be imputed; for example, in many jurisdictions, in cases of where a corporate insider "tips" a friend about non-public information likely to have an effect on the company's share price, the duty the corporate insider owes the company is now imputed to the friend and the friend violates a duty to the company if he trades on the basis of this information.

Liability for inside trading violations generally cannot be avoided by passing on the information in an "I scratch your back; you scratch mine" or quid pro quo arrangement if the person receiving the information knew or should have known that the information was material non-public information. In the United States, at least one court has indicated that the insider who releases the non-public information must have done so for an improper purpose.

In the case of a person who receives the insider information called the "tippee"the tippee must also have been aware that the insider released the information for an improper purpose. One commentator has argued that if Company A's CEO did not trade on the undisclosed takeover news, but instead passed the information on to his brother-in-law who traded on it, illegal insider trading would still have occurred albeit by proxy by passing it on to a "non-insider" so Company A's CEO wouldn't get his hands dirty.

A newer view of insider trading, the misappropriation theory, is now accepted in U. It states that anyone who misappropriates information from his or her employer and trades on that information in any stock either the employer's stock or the company's competitor stocks may be guilty of insider trading. Proving that someone has been responsible for a trade can be difficult because traders may try to hide behind nominees, offshore companies, and other proxies.

The Securities and Exchange Commission prosecutes over 50 cases each year, with many being settled administratively out of court. The SEC and several stock exchanges actively monitor trading, looking for suspicious activity.

Attorney's Office for further investigation and prosecution. In the Unites States and most non-European jurisdictions not all trading on non-public information is illegal insider trading. Notwithstanding, information about a tender offer usually regarding a merger or acquisition is held to a higher standard. If this type of information is obtained directly or indirectly and there is reason to believe it is nonpublic, there is a duty to disclose it or abstain from trading.

The punishment for insider trading depends on a few different factors. There are three main factors, which can be identified. Depending on jurisdictions, there may be either civil or criminal penalties, or both. In the United States in addition to civil penalties, the trader may also be subject to criminal prosecution for fraud or where SEC regulations have been broken, the U. Department of Justice DOJ may be called to conduct an independent parallel investigation.

If the DOJ finds criminal wrongdoing, the Department may file criminal charges. Since insiders are required to report their trades, others often track these traders, and there is a school of investing which follows the lead of insiders. Following such leads subjects the follower to the risk that an insider is making a buy specifically to increase investor confidence, or is making a sale for reasons unrelated to the health of the company such as a desire to diversify or pay a personal expense.

Legal trades by insiders are common, [2] as employees of publicly traded corporations often have stock or stock options. These trades are made public in the United States through Securities and Exchange Commission filingsmainly Form 4.

SEC Rule 10b clarified that the prohibition against insider trading does not require proof that an insider actually used material nonpublic information when conducting a trade; possession of such information alone is sufficient to violate the provision, and the SEC would infer that an insider in possession of material nonpublic information used this information when conducting a trade.

However, SEC Rule 10b also created for insiders an affirmative defense if the insider can demonstrate that the trades conducted on behalf of the insider were conducted as part of a pre-existing contract or written binding plan for trading in the future. For example, if an insider expects to retire after a specific period of time and, as part of retirement planning, the insider has adopted a written binding plan to sell a specific amount of the company's stock every month for two years, and the insider later comes into possession of material nonpublic information about the company, trades based on the original plan might not constitute prohibited insider trading.

Until the 21st Century and the European Union's market abuse laws, the United States was the leading country in prohibiting insider trading made on the basis of material non-public information. Securities and Exchange Commission SEC summarize the development of US insider trading laws. This means that first-time offenders are eligible to receive probation rather than incarceration.

Inwell before the Securities Exchange Act was passed, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a corporate director who bought that company's stock when he knew the stock's price was about to increase committed fraud by buying but not disclosing his inside information. Section 15 of the Securities Act of [17] contained prohibitions of fraud in the sale of securities which were greatly strengthened by the Securities Exchange Act of Under Section 10 b of the Act, SEC Rule 10b-5prohibits fraud related to securities trading.

The Insider Trading Sanctions Act of and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of place penalties for illegal insider trading as high as three times the amount of profit gained or loss avoided from the illegal trading. SEC regulation FD "Fair Disclosure" requires that if a company intentionally discloses material non-public information to one person, it must simultaneously disclose that information to the public at large.

In the case of an unintentional disclosure of material non-public information to one person, the company must make a public disclosure "promptly. Insider trading, or similar practices, are also regulated by the SEC under its rules on takeovers and tender offers under the Williams Act.

Inthe Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Strong v. Repide [20] that a director who expects to act in a way that affects the value of shares cannot use that knowledge to acquire shares from those who do not know of the expected action. Even though in general, ordinary relations between directors and shareholders in a business corporation are not of such a fiduciary nature as to make it the duty of a director to disclose to a shareholder the general knowledge which he may possess regarding the value of the shares of the company before he purchases any from a shareholder, yet there are cases where, by reason of the special facts, such duty exists.

Inthe Second Circuit Court of Appeals advanced a "level playing field" theory of insider trading in SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. Officers of the Texas Gulf Sulphur Corporation had used inside information about the discovery of the Kidd Mine to make profits by buying shares and call options on company stock. Inthe Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Dirks v.

Application of the Federal Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes to Criminal Liability for Stock Market Insider Trading and Tipping | CLS Blue Sky Blog

Securities and Exchange Commission [23] that tippees receivers of second-hand information are liable if they had reason to believe that the tipper had breached a fiduciary duty in disclosing confidential information. One such example would be if the tipper received any personal benefit from the disclosure, thereby breaching his or her duty of loyalty to the company.

In Dirksthe "tippee" received confidential information from an insider, a former employee of a company. The reason the insider disclosed the information to the tippee, and the reason the tippee disclosed the information to third parties, was to blow the whistle on massive fraud at the company. As a result of the tippee's efforts the fraud was uncovered, and the company went into bankruptcy.

But, while the tippee had given the forex daily range breakout information to clients who made profits from the information, the U.

Supreme Court ruled that the tippee could not be held liable under the federal securities laws—for the simple reason that the insider from whom he received the information was not releasing the information for an improper purpose a personal benefitbut rather for the purpose of exposing the fraud.

The Supreme Court ruled that the tippee could not have been aiding and abetting a securities law violation committed by the insider—for the simple reason that no securities law violation had been committed by the insider. In Dirksthe Supreme Court also defined the concept of "constructive insiders," who are forex account with free vps server, investment bankers and others who receive confidential information from a corporation while pcyc stock buy or sell services to the corporation.

Constructive insiders are also liable for insider trading violations if the corporation expects the information to remain confidential, since they acquire the fiduciary duties of the true insider. The next expansion of insider trading liability came in SEC vs. Materia [24] F. Materia, a jeep wrangler parts melbourne printing firm proofreader, and clearly not an insider by any definition, was found to have determined the identity of takeover targets based on proofreading tender offer documents during his employment.

After a two-week trial, the district court found him liable for insider trading, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed holding that the theft of information from an employer, and the use of that information to purchase or sell securities in another entity, constituted a fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of a securities. The misappropriation theory of insider trading was born, and liability further expanded to encompass a larger group of outsiders.

Chart stock market historical United States v.

Carpenter [25] the U. Supreme Court cited an earlier ruling while unanimously upholding mail and wire fraud convictions for a defendant who received his information from a journalist rather than from the company itself. Foster Winans was also convicted, on the grounds that he had misappropriated information belonging to his employer, the Wall Street Journal.

In that widely publicized case, Winans traded in advance of "Heard on the Street" columns appearing in the Journal. The Court stated in Carpenter: However, in upholding the securities fraud insider trading convictions, the justices were evenly split. Inthe U. Supreme Court adopted the misappropriation theory of insider trading in United States v.

O'Hagan[27] U. O'Hagan was a partner in a law firm representing Grand Metropolitanwhile it was considering a tender offer for Pillsbury Company. O'Hagan claimed that neither he nor his firm owed a fiduciary duty to Pillsbury, so he did not commit fraud by purchasing Pillsbury options. The "misappropriation theory" holds that a person commits fraud "in connection with" a securities transaction and thereby violates 10 b and Rule 10b-5, when he misappropriates confidential information for securities trading purposes, in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information.

Under this theory, a fiduciary's undisclosed, self-serving use of a principal's information to purchase or sell securities, in breach of a duty of loyalty and confidentiality, defrauds the principal of the exclusive use of the information. In lieu of premising liability on a fiduciary relationship between company insider and purchaser or seller of the company's stock, the misappropriation theory premises liability on a fiduciary-turned-trader's deception of those who entrusted him with access to confidential information.

The Court specifically recognized that a corporation's information is its property: The undisclosed misappropriation of such information in violation of a fiduciary duty Inthe SEC enacted SEC Rule 10bwhich defined trading "on the basis of" inside information as any time a person trades while aware of material nonpublic information.

It is no longer a defense for one to say that one would have made the trade anyway. The rule also created an affirmative defense for pre-planned trades.

Inin the case of United States v. Newmanthe United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cited the Supreme Court's decision in Dirksand ruled that in order for a how does discover cashback bonus work on amazon a person who has received insider information from an insider and has used that information to be guilty of insider trading, the tippee must have been aware not only that the information was insider information, but must also have been aware that the insider released the information for an improper purpose such as a personal benefit.

The Court concluded that the insider's breach of a fiduciary duty not to release confidential information—in the absence of an improper purpose on the part of the insider—is not enough for criminal liability to be imposed on the either the insider or the tippee.

Onin the case of Salman v. United Statesthe U. Supreme Court held that the benefit a tipper has to receive as predicate for an insider-trader prosecution of a tippee need not be pecuniary, and that giving a 'gift' of a tip to a family member is presumptively an act for the personal though intangible benefit of the tipper.

Members of the US Congress are not exempt from the laws that ban make money as a mixing engineer trading. Because they generally do not have a confidential relationship with the source of the information they receive, however, they do not meet the usual definition of an "insider.

A study found that stock sales and purchases by Senators outperformed the market by Also the same day trade effective the next dayCongressman Boehner cashed out of an equity mutual fund.

In Maya bill entitled the "Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, or STOCK Act " was introduced that would hold congressional and federal employees liable for stock trades they made using information they gained through their jobs and also regulate analysts or "Political Intelligence" firms that research government activities.

Infederal prosecutors issued a subpoena to the House Ways and Means committee and Brian Sutter, staff director of its health-care sub-committee, relative to a price move in stocks just prior to the passage of a law favorable to the companies involved.

An e-mail was sent out by a "Washington-based policy-research firm that predicted the change [in the law] for its Wall Street clients. That alert, in turn, was based in part on information provided to the firm by a former congressional health-care aide turned lobbyist, according to emails reviewed by the [Wall Street] Journal in Security analysts gather and compile information, talk to corporate officers and other insiders, and issue recommendations to traders.

Thus their activities may easily cross legal lines if they are not especially careful. The CFA Institute in its code of choosing penny stock brokers comparisons states that analysts should make every effort to make all reports available to all the broker's clients on a timely basis. Analysts should never report material nonpublic information, except in an effort united states law stock market insider trading tipping make that information available to the general public.

Nevertheless, analysts' reports may jquery create dynamic select options a variety of information that is "pieced together" without violating insider trading laws, under the Mosaic theory. Some economists and legal scholars such as Henry ManneMilton FriedmanThomas SowellDaniel Fischeland Frank H.

Easterbrook have argued that laws against insider trading should be repealed. They claim that insider trading based on material nonpublic information benefits investors, in general, by more quickly introducing new information into the market. Friedman, laureate of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economicssaid: You want to give the people most likely to have knowledge about deficiencies of the company an incentive to make the public aware of that.

Other critics argue that insider trading is a victimless act: The Atlantic has described the process as "arguably the closest thing that modern how to make easy money in pokemon gold has to a victimless crime". Legalization advocates also question why "trading" earning money on wordpress blogs one party has more information than the other is legal in other markets, such as real estate divorce unvested stock option, but not in the stock market.

For example, if a geologist knows there is a high likelihood of the discovery of petroleum under Farmer Smith's land, he may be entitled to make Smith an offer for the land, and buy it, without first telling Farmer Smith of the geological data.

Advocates of legalization make free speech arguments. Punishment for communicating about a development pertinent to the next day's stock price might seem an act of censorship. Some authors have used these arguments to propose legalizing insider trading on negative information but not on positive information. Since negative information is often withheld from the market, trading on such information has a higher value for the market than trading on positive information.

There are very limited laws against "insider trading" in the commodities markets if, for no other reason than that the concept of an "insider" is not immediately analogous to commodities themselves corn, wheat, steel, etc. However, analogous activities such as front running are illegal under US commodity and futures trading laws. For example, a commodity broker can be charged with fraud by receiving a large purchase order from a client one likely to affect the price of that commodity and then purchasing that commodity before executing the client's order to benefit from the anticipated price increase.

The advent of the Internet has provided a forum for the commercialisation of trading on insider information. In a number of dark web sites were identified as marketplaces where such non-public information was bought and sold. At least one such site used bitcoins to avoid currency restrictions and to impede tracking. Such sites also provide a place for soliciting for corporate informants, where non-public information may be how to make money donating eggs for purposes [43] other than stock trading.

The US and the UK vary in the way work from home mlis law is interpreted and applied with regard to insider trading. The is a much broader scope that under U. The key differences from U.

Japan enacted its first law against insider trading in Roderick Seeman said, "Even today many Japanese do not understand why this is illegal. Indeed, previously it was regarded as common sense to make a profit from your knowledge. In Malta the law follows the European broader scope model.

The relevant statute is the Prevention of Financial Markets Abuse Act ofas amended. The International Organization of Securities Commissions IOSCO paper on the "Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation" updated to [54] states that the three objectives of good securities market regulation are:.

The United States Law on Stock Market Insider Trading and Tipping by William K. S. Wang :: SSRN

The discussion of these "Core Principles" state that "investor protection" in this context means "Investors should be protected from misleading, manipulative or fraudulent practices, including insider trading, front running or trading ahead of customers and the misuse of client assets. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund now use the IOSCO Core Principles in reviewing the financial health of different country's regulatory systems as part of these organization's financial sector assessment program, so laws against insider trading based on non-public information are now expected by the international community.

Enforcement of insider trading laws varies widely from country to country, but the vast majority of jurisdictions now outlaw the practice, at least in principle. Larry Harris claims that differences in the effectiveness with which countries restrict insider trading help to explain the differences in executive compensation among those countries. The US, for example, has much higher CEO salaries than do Japan or Germany, where insider trading is less effectively restrained. Inthe European Union EU adopted legislation Criminal Sanctions for Market Abuse Directive that harmonises criminal sanctions for insider dealing.

All EU Member States agreed to introduce maximum prison sentences of at least four years for serious cases of market manipulation and insider dealing, and at least two years for improper disclosure of insider information. Ina journalist in Nettavisen Thomas Gulbrandsen was sentenced to 4 months in prison for insider trading. The longest prison sentence in a Norwegian trial where the main charge was insider trading, was for 8 years 2 of which suspended when Alain Angelil was convicted in a district court on December 9, Although insider trading in the UK has been illegal sinceit proved difficult to successfully prosecute individuals accused of insider trading.

There were a number of notorious cases where individuals were able to escape prosecution. Instead the UK regulators relied on a series of fines to punish market abuses. These fines were widely perceived as an ineffective deterrent Cole,[60] and there was a statement of intent by the UK regulator the Financial Services Authority to use its powers to enforce the legislation specifically the Financial Services and Markets Act Between — the FSA secured 14 convictions in relation to insider dealing.

The case was prosecuted by the office of United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara. With the guilty plea by Perkins Hixon in for insider trading from while at Evercore PartnersBharara said in a press release that defendants whom his office had charged since August had now been convicted. On December 10,a federal appeals court overturned the insider trading convictions of two former hedge fund tradersTodd Newman and Anthony Chiassonbased on the "erroneous" instructions given to jurors by the trial judge.

Attorney [65] and the SEC [66] in did drop their cases against Steinberg and others. InSean Stewart, a former managing director at Perella Weinberg Partners LP and vice president at JPMorgan Chasewas convicted on allegations he tipped his father on pending health-care deals. InWilliam T. Walters's source, company director Thomas C. Davis employing a prepaid cell phone and sometimes the code words "Dallas Cowboys" for Dean Foods, helped him from to realize profits and avoid losses in the stock, the Federal jury found.

In the trial, investor Carl C. Icahn was mentioned in relation to Walters's trading but was not charged with wrongdoing.

Walters's lawyer said he would appeal the verdict. Cornblum committed suicide before criminal charges were laid. Grmovsek pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 39 months in prison.

Insider Trading

This was the longest term ever imposed for insider trading in Canada. These crimes were explored in Mark Coakley 's non-fiction book, Tip and Trade. On October 1,Chinese fund manager Xu Xiang was arrested due to insider trading. Insider Trading in India is an offense according to Section of the Companies Act, and Sections 12A, 15G of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, Insider trading is when one with access to non public, price sensitive information about the securities of the company subscribes, buys, sells or deals, or agrees to do so or counsels another to do as principal or agent.

Price sensitive information is information that will materially affect the value of the securities. Penalty for insider trading is imprisonment which may extend to five years, minimum of five lakh rupees five hundred thousand to twenty five crore rupees two hundred and fifty million or three times the profit made; whichever is higher.

Insider trading is legal as long as disclosure of the holdings and trading in securities of the company is done by the insiders. Any other connected person or group of connected persons shall also disclose their holdings under this regulation. The gist of these rules is that an insider cannot trade on non-public information until that information is disclosed, and cannot tip people off using non-public information. Promoters, key managerial personnel and director of every company whose securities are listed on any recognized exchange shall disclose his holding of securities within 30 days of these regulations taking effect to the company.

Every person on appointment as key managerial personnel, director of the company or upon becoming a promoter shall disclose his holding of securities of company within 7 days of such appointment to the company. Every promoter, director or employee of the company shall disclose to the company, the number of securities acquired or disposed of within two days of such transaction, if the value of securities traded through one transaction or series of transaction in a calendar quarter exceeds 10 lakh rupees or any other value as may be prescribed.

Under Republic Act or the Securities Regulation Code, insider trading in the Philippines is illegal. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Inside Information disambiguation. How Two Lawyers Made Millions From Insider Trading.

Speech by SEC Staff: Insider Trading — A U. The Impact of Enforcement" by John C. Archived from the original on 30 June NewmanF.

Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved March 23, Archived from the original on June 24, MIT Sloan Mangement Review. The Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 7 December New standards for "legal" insider trading.

Retrieved December 21, Repide — U. Justia US Supreme Court Center". Retrieved August 20, Retrieved March 3, Remarks at the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Business Editors and Writers". Trading stock on inside information?

Senate"December Spencer Bachus Should Resign In Disgrace". Retrieved November 17, Archived from the original on August 12, Retrieved September 20, Retrieved September 14, The Washington Post Company. Retrieved May 29, Should Insider Trading Be Made Legal? Retrieved January 7, An Economic Reinterpretation of the Case Law, University of Memphis Law Reviewvol.

Leakers sell inside trading tips on dark web". Archived from the original on 14 February The Financial Services and Markets Act " PDF. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. Archived PDF from the original on 15 February Financial Conduct Authority FCU.

Archived from the original on 9 November Government of the United Kingdom. Archived PDF from the original on 14 February Archived from the original on March 9, Prevention of Financial Markets Abuse Act". Ministry for Justice, Culture and Local Government, Government of Malta. Archived from the original on 15 February International Organization of Securities Commissions IOSCO. Archived PDF from the original on 29 August Retrieved August 15, The Strategic Trading of Insiders around News Announcements".

Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. Retrieved December 28, Retrieved June 15, Retrieved April 3, Retrieved December 10, Attorney Aims to Dismiss Insider Trading Charges in SAC Capital Advisors Case"Wall Street JournalOctober 22, Walters, Famed Sports Bettor, Is Guilty in Insider Trading Case"The New York TimesApril 7, Retrieved November 23, Retrieved February 14, Retrieved 29 November This audio file was created from a revision of the " Insider trading " article datedand does not reflect subsequent edits to the article.

Chinese wall Conflict of interest in the health care industry Funding bias Insider trading Judicial disqualification Nepotism Regulatory capture Self-dealing Self-regulation State capture Shill.

AllTrials Arm's length principle Bias Business ethics Cochrane Collaboration Corruption Cui bono Follow the money Legal ethics Lobbying Medical ethics cases Medical ghostwriter Moral hazard Pharmaceutical marketing Pharmaceutical sales representative Pharmacovigilance Political ethics Revolving door Sponsorship of continuing medical education. Michael Davis Ben Goldacre Sheldon Krimsky Leemon McHenry Wayne Norman.

Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia Study Nemo iudex in causa sua R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet No 2 R v Neil R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy. Bad Pharma Big Pharma Inside Job Side Effects Who Killed the Electric Car? Conflict of interest Category: Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia. Retrieved from " https: Corruption Financial crimes Insider trading Stock market Ethically disputed business practices Conflict of interest Information.

Pages containing links to subscription-only content All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from September Articles with inconsistent citation formats CS1 Norwegian-language sources no All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April Spoken articles Articles with hAudio microformats Articles with dead external links from May Articles with permanently dead external links Pages using ISBN magic links.

Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in. Views Read Edit View history. Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia store. Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact page. Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Cite this page.

In other projects Wikiversity. This page was last edited on 12 Juneat Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view. Look up insider trading in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.